Erica De Mane

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

5 Responses

1. on March 16, 2012 at 2:29 pm | Reply Michael Sadowski

   I think we’re stretching the definition of “Women With Fish” with this video post. Technically, Sophia Loren is collecting sponges which are undersea animals, yes, but do they qualify as “fish” per se? Since she is in an environment with fish in the video, the images qualify under your loose set of rules but I offer that the post should be re-titled “Fish With Woman.” Also, sponges do not have fins… unless they’re driving in a 1959 Chevrolet Impala…and they are only edible when baked into the form of a cake. (i.e. “sponge cake”) Otherwise, it’s a fine addition to your ongoing collection mostly because Sophia Loren looks so swell in scarce, wet clothing.

   
   
2. on March 16, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Reply Erica

   I decided woman swimming with fish (and , true, collecting sponges) should qualify. Plus it’s Sophia so it had to go up.

   
   
3. on March 16, 2012 at 4:57 pm | Reply liti

   What kind of sponges?I didn’t notice,but I also can’t see Sophia’s face.Liti

   
   
4. on March 16, 2012 at 4:58 pm | Reply liti

   Sorry,I realized duh,its a video.Breitbart

   
   
5. on March 17, 2012 at 11:06 am | Reply Erica

   Breitbart,

   Now I’m thinking I’ve diluted the woman with fish concept by putting up a video. I think they should all be still images. Although if you’ve got to see someone wiggling around underwater, it might as well be Sophia Loren.

   
   

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.